<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GRUBER: EXPERT REPORT ON FORWARD-LOOKING REMEDIES TO COMBAT YOUTH SMOKING</title>
	<link>http://www.tobacco-on-trial.com/2005/03/21/gruber-expert-report-on-forward-looking-remedies-to-combat-youth-smoking/</link>
	<description>Blogging U.S. vs. Philip Morris, Inc.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: tobacco observer</title>
		<link>http://www.tobacco-on-trial.com/2005/03/21/gruber-expert-report-on-forward-looking-remedies-to-combat-youth-smoking/#comment-351</link>
		<author>tobacco observer</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tobacco-on-trial.com/2005/03/21/gruber-expert-report-on-forward-looking-remedies-to-combat-youth-smoking/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>"Therefore, this remedy can play a vital role in ensuring that the tobacco manufacturers take affirmative actions to reduce actions which attract youth to their products."
****

Since marketing cigarettes to youth (especially "youth" over 18 who are legally entitled to smoke) isn't actually a violation of RICO, or any other law, this remedy is impermissible and irrelevant.

Nice try, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Therefore, this remedy can play a vital role in ensuring that the tobacco manufacturers take affirmative actions to reduce actions which attract youth to their products.&#8221;<br />
****</p>
<p>Since marketing cigarettes to youth (especially &#8220;youth&#8221; over 18 who are legally entitled to smoke) isn&#8217;t actually a violation of RICO, or any other law, this remedy is impermissible and irrelevant.</p>
<p>Nice try, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
